Ninth Circuit Rules That Facebook’s Facial Recognition Could Violate Biometric Law
|

Ninth Circuit Rules That Facebook’s Facial Recognition Could Violate Biometric Law

Ninth Circuit Rules That Facebook’s Facial Recognition Could Violate Biometric Law

Technology recognizing your face in a picture before even you do?

It seems crazy. But that is the world in which we now live. However, some residents of Illinois are fighting for their privacy in a specific area—Facebook’s tag suggestion facial recognition feature.

Here’s the summary
On Aug. 9, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously upheld certification of a class of Illinois Facebook users alleging that the social media giant’s facial recognition feature called “tag suggestions” violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). BIPA is probably the strictest law in the U.S. regarding biometric data. Biometric data includes scans of the eye, face, fingerprint, and other methods of identity data collection. Many argue that people must stand firm in their rights to privacy whereas others would say that technology cannot continue to grow without adaptation on our end. Where do we draw the line between allowing for technological advancement and choosing to overlook blatant infringements on personal privacy?

What does the Ninth Circuit say?
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit argues that the development of a face template using facial recognition technology without consent is taking Facebook’s involvement too far. They point out that since Facebook keeps face templates, inevitably they could use people’s photos for whatever purposes they see fit, including opening people’s phones or even tracking people’s location according to other photos in which they appear on Facebook.

What does Facebook say?
Without success, Facebook argued that for BIPA to apply, Facebook users would have to provide proof that their photos were uploaded in Illinois and that the company could be sued for violating the state law even though facial data is stored and scanned on servers outside of Illinois. These arguments were rejected by the Ninth Circuit.

Staying up to date on developments like this is important in the ever-changing world of background screening. A professional screening partner like ClearStar can help. Contact us today.

Let's start a conversation

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

At ClearStar, we are committed to your success. An important part of your employment screening program involves compliance with various laws and regulations, which is why we are providing information regarding screening requirements in certain countries, region, etc. While we are happy to provide you with this information, it is your responsibility to comply with applicable laws and to understand how such information pertains to your employment screening program. The foregoing information is not offered as legal advice but is instead offered for informational purposes. ClearStar is not a law firm and does not offer legal advice and this communication does not form an attorney client relationship. The foregoing information is therefore not intended as a substitute for the legal advice of a lawyer knowledgeable of the user’s individual circumstances or to provide legal advice. ClearStar makes no assurances regarding the accuracy, completeness, or utility of the information contained in this publication. Legislative, regulatory and case law developments regularly impact on general research and this area is evolving rapidly. ClearStar expressly disclaim any warranties or responsibility or damages associated with or arising out of the information provided herein.

resources & insights

Related Articles